目前日期文章:201102 (8)

瀏覽方式: 標題列表 簡短摘要

路線 (在聖彼得堡之前先去了美國)
在這個分類: 旅行--> 2010聖彼德堡 to 台灣

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()



Danny Boyle證明了他的才能,利用實驗性質的影像:分割鏡頭,高反差,失焦等等,切合心理狀態的音樂運用,最精采的仍是James Franco的演出,讓這段過程扣人心弦。,否則,這裡的故事情節僅是由主角的片段回憶所組成,但之所以產生令人有繼續看下去的動力的無非就是上述導演與演員的精采表現。

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

"the blind side" isn't bad but is nothing but a pop movie. The premise of adaption from true story which might be written in poster, is the only thing to convince audience its reality. Anything esle about the plot is absolutely pale and shallow. Its main function is to comfort people by the filtered inspirational story but ignore anything bad. That's ok, surely, don't be so sreious. and by its nomination by AMPAS shows the commercial essence of the academy again.

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

What a amzing excellent horroe movie about a insane teenager's illusion,it's about irony of reality, sadness of the truth, inevitable fate, critism of hypocritical adults. It mentioned time travelling but it takes it as a raw to duscuss free will. The most important is it's still a story. Yes it has something interesting but it's never a lession.

But, it's still too weird for people. sadess, and darkness. I think probaly hard-core fan would like it. it's a cult movie.

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Some people can not understand why somebody would post some secrets on public internet?

Maybe it’s kind of therapy by revealing one’s own stories and then trace back the source of sadness. Or at least gets a remission by expressing one’s feeling.

I don’t think it’s cowardice to show soft spot to people. What a coward would do is seeking of consolation BY doing this.

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()




milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(1) 人氣()

精巧的故事被導演用流暢環環相扣的敘事帶出,這樣的影匠技巧是一個優秀導演的基本功夫。中島哲也無疑是被歸類成強烈的表現主義的導演,他讓我們知道了不是他把電影拍的像MV(ex: across the universe),而是把MV的表現方式用電影的血肉成長出更鮮豔的花朵,讓電影這門藝術再次證明了它的多元。



milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

"Shutter Island", made by Martin Scorsese, made some people disappointed due to its insufficient difficulties of puzzle. However, I don’t think the producer or director intend to make a suspense film but a plot with a puzzle to perform a man who is suffered by his past memory without any awareness. If he really wants to play a riddle game with audience, he has a lot of chances to bewilder us. The point is how it goes and what he shows along with the plot. I see the leading man: outstanding actor Leonardo Dicaprio shows how a patient lost himself in continued nightmare; I see a few excellent sections shows a good director’s skills to render a horror atmosphere; and the best is the ability to overlook total plot and made every line every word every move has its own function. Especially in the rear part, what appear in the front become clues to the truth. Nothing is wasted. It’s so CLEVER and I always found this kind of work in sophisticated directors, maybe it manifests sort of wisdom in veteran directing.

Although it doesn’t show obvious intention to deeper meanings, director still insert some meaningful line to give audience a glance of his ideology: please notice every conversation between insane Teddy (Dicaprio) and other persons, it’s about violence, of people, of institution, of Country, these dialogue is made elaborate.

The end is unexpected not due to the puzzle itself, as I said, it’s not hard, and director seems not intend to focus on this, the unexpectedness is rendered undramatically: Teddy seems leave his “cycle” and then director tells us he fails actually, but actually, he made choice. And it undoubtedly means, whatever this is reality or dream, true or fake, he decides to own the good and dies.

milstein 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()